Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0367320020130010177
Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
2002 Volume.13 No. 1 p.177 ~ p.188
THE DIFFERENCE OF THE BEHAVIORAL PROBLEM AND MATERNAL REARING PATTERN BETWEEN ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS IN PEER NEGLECT OR REJECT AND THOSE IN NON-NEGLECT
Son Jung-Woo

Abstract
Objectives : The major goal of this study was to investigate and compare the behavior problems and mothers¢¥ rearing pattern between adolescent psychiatric patients either neglected or rejected by peer and those who were neither neglected nor rejected by peer.

Methods : Adolescent psychiatric patients (N=25) performed peer neglect scale, peer reject scale. And their mothers performed the part of Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) , Maternal Behavior Research Instrument (MBRI), the scale for the maternal concern about the social life of their own patients, and the scale for maternal concern about the friendship of their own patients. According to the score of the peer neglect scale and the peer reject scale, we divided the patients into `peer neglect-reject¢¥ group (n=15) and `non-loneliness¢¥ g-oup(n=10), and compared the scores of other scales between each group. Also, we investigated the co. relation among all scales.

Results :
1) The scores of the part of CBCL (p <.05) , depressed/anxious subscale of CBCL (p <.05) and thought problem subscale of CBCL (p <.O 1) in peer neglect-reject group were significantly higher than those in non-neglect group. The score of peer neglect scale was significantly correlated with that of the part of CBCL (r=.516) , depressed/anxious subscale of CBCL (r=.483) , thought problem subscale of CBCL (r=.651) , social problem subscale of CBCL (r=.517) . And the score of peer reject scale was significantly correlated with that of attention subscale of CBCL (r=.414) , thought problem subscale of CBCL (r=.446) , social problem subscale of CBCL (r=.531) .
2) But, each group was not significantly different on the scores of MBRI, the scale for the maternal concern about the social life of their own patients, and the scale for maternal concern about the friendship of their own patients. And there were no significant correlation between the scores of peer neglect / peer reject scale and those of scales for maternal rearing pattern.

Conclusion : The thought problem and depression/anxiety problem of adolescent psychiatric patients neglected or rejected by peer were estimated more higher than those of adolescent psychiatric patients neither neglected nor rejected by peer. But, from the view of maternal rearing pattern, each 2 groups seemed not to be different. Further research using more subjects will be needed.
KEYWORD
Peer neglect, Peer reject, Adolescent psychiatric patient, Behavioral problem, Rearing pattern
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø